_

Welcome to Vital Label!

Vital Label is a blog focused on the importance of labeling in consumer products.

Malaysia National Consumers Day 2014 (HPM 2014)

The National Consumers Day is an annual event organized by FOMCA. Let's celebrate it by participating in 12 competitions held at the national level.

Follow Us On Facebook

Like our Facebook page to get our updates on your news feed.

Monday, June 30, 2014

Confusion About Food Labels Leads to Waste, Possible Illnesses


Consumers often get confused by date labeling on food products, and end up either keeping spoiled food around too long, or throwing away perfectly good food unnecessarily -- costing us billions of dollars, experts say.

In new a survey by the public health and safety organization NSF International, researchers found that people have trouble understanding and differentiating between common food label terms such as "expiration date," "best if used by date" and "sell by date."

Consequently, almost half of Americans do not throw away food until they see mold or color changes. And 17 percent of Americans say they just toss food when it starts to smell.

Failing to discard food on time may result in exposure to pathogens such as salmonella or E. coli, Gina Nicholson, NSF International Global Client Director of Retail Food Services, told CBS News. Those contaminants are especially dangerous to children under 5, elderly people and those whose immunity has been compromised by illnesses such as cancer or HIV.

At the same time, the authors of a review paper published this week in the journal Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety stressed that the lack of understanding of different date labeling terms may in fact encourage people to throw food away too soon and therefore contribute to food waste that is already a significant problem in developed countries.

The authors called for increased collaboration between food manufacturers and regulatory agencies to provide a better and more uniform food labeling system.

"We are throwing away a third of our food (globally)," study author William Fisher, VP at the Institute of Food Technologists Science and Policy Initiatives, told CBS News, adding that confusion over product labeling certainly contributes to the extent of food waste.

In the U.S. alone, about 133 billion pounds of food -- almost a third of the total available at the retail and consumer level -- is wasted each year, according to 2010 figures from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. That translates into an estimated $161.6 billion in retail value.

So what do consumers need to know about date labels on food? Fisher explained the differences:
  • "Sell by date" is most important for retailers, telling them when they should take a product off the shelves. However, it does not mean that the food is no longer safe to eat.
  • "Expiration date" means a product should not be eaten after the date listed; throw it out.
  • "Best if used by date" refers to the quality of the product, not its safety. In short, it means that the product will maintain its maximum quality until that date, but it can still be safe to eat for a certain amount of time (depending on the kind of product) after the date has passed.
Retrieved from : CBS News

Sunday, June 29, 2014

Nutritional Labelling


The nutritional fact labeling (also known as the nutrition information panel, and various other slight variations) is required on most pre-packaged foods in North America, United Kingdom and other countries. 
The Nutritional Labeling Act, initiated by Ministry of Health Malaysia in year 2003, states that food producers and importers are required to include a specific list of "nutrition facts" on product labels in a pre-defined format. The Ministry of Health Malaysia has amended the Food Regulations on 29 September 2005 to make nutrition labeling compulsory for certain foods, as well as regulate health and nutrition claims. 
The nutrients that must be declared on nutrition label are energy, protein, carbohydrate and fat. In addition, total sugars must also be declared for ready-to-drink beverages. In these regulations, ready-to-drink beverages include ready-to-drink soft drink, fruit and vegetable juices, ready-to-drink malted milk and flavored milk. They do not include alcoholic beverages.

MALAYSIA NUTRITIONAL LABEL


Where a claim is made regarding the amount or type of fatty acids, the amounts of all the four main types of fatty acids, namely saturated, monounsaturated, polyunsaturated and trans fatty acids shall be declared in the following form:

Source : MyTEST Lab


Reading Food Labels


When shopping for food, an easy way of checking whether food products are safe for you to eat is to read the label. This will give you a list of the ingredients in the product and also highlights any allergens present. 

This video explains what information is on food products and how this can help you identify which foods are safe for you to eat.

A short video produced by Coeliac UK.

Read more here.

Saturday, June 28, 2014

Many Food Labels Mislead Consumers



The Food and Drug Administration is cracking down on food manufacturers for misleading consumers about the nutrient content of their products on the front label of the packaging.

An excerpts from the KUJH-TV Newscast produced by students at the William Allen White School of Journalism, University of Kansas, United States of America.

Friday, June 27, 2014

Food Labeling Requirement in Malaysia (Part 1 of 6)


1.       All labels shall be durably marked on the material of the package or on material firmly attached to the package.
1.1    However if a package is made of clear transparent material, then the label can be placed directly inside the package provided:
§  the food in the package is not ready for direct consumption or
§  If it is ready for direct consumption, food is to be completely enclosed in its natural shell or pod or interior wrapper.
1.2    For legibility, specific requirements for font size, style, contrasting colour of letterings have been prescribed in the Regulations for the labels.
(e.g font size in no smaller than 10 point lettering for most particulars; font size in no smaller than 4 point lettering for information on ingredients and nutritional labeling; no smaller than 2 point lettering for very small packages, etc.)
2.       Language to be used for information required on the label depends on the country of origin as follows:
2.1    Products of Malaysia
§  Shall be labelled in Bahasa Malaysia AND may include translation in any other language.
2.2    All other imported foods
§  Shall be labelled in Bahasa Malaysia OR English AND may include translation in any other language.
3.       Important particulars expected to be on the label are as follows:
3.1    A description of the food containing the common name of its principal ingredients, for eg. “Sweet Corn Cream Style”, “Beef patties”.
§  In the case of food product being a mixed and blended food, the label shall indicate the contents are mixed or blended, for eg. “Mixed vegetables”.
§  where the food contains beef or pork, or its derivatives, or lard, a statement as to the presence in that food of such beef or pork, or its derivatives, or lard, in the form—
"CONTAINS
  (state  whether  beef  or  pork,  or  its  derivatives,  or  lard,  as  the case may be)"
or in any other words to this effect;
§  where  the  food  contains  added  alcohol,  a  statement  as  to  the  presence  in thatfood  of  such  alcohol,  in  capital  bold-faced  lettering  of  a  non-serif character not smaller than 6 point, in the form—

"CONTAINS ALCOHOL"

 or in any other words to this effect;



*All information on the labeling requirements of food sold in Malaysia gleaned from the Malaysia Food Regulations 1985 and Food Irradiation Regulations 2011 (as at March 2013).

Wednesday, June 25, 2014

What Are the Key Characteristics of Good Product Labeling?


Based on World Federation of Direct Selling Associations (WFDSA) on their websitegood labeling must cover 5 important areas, namely;

  1. Provide basic information
    The product label must state the brand name, the price, the standard certification or expiry date for food products and the name and address of the manufacturer.

  2. Details of the content or ingredients
    A good product label should give information on the contents, and for food items, the ingredients used. The information provided must be such that consumers can understand the meaning or look the meaning up in a dictionary and not some term coined up by the manufacturer of his/her product advertising agent. The information must include the weight and measurements as well.

  3. Instruction for use
    Another characteristic of a good label is one that contains clear and precise instructions on the use of the product. In addition to product labelling, more product information is needed such as on electrical equipment, computers, machinery, etc. In the case of food items, tonics and medicines, the amount and dosage must be clearly stated. The instruction should include instructions for storage and maintenance.

  4. Warning and contra indications
    A good label should also contain warnings of possible dangers and hazards. In the case of food and medicines, the label should provide contra indivations and possible side effects.

  5. Visible and easy to read
    Labels are for consumers. A good label is one that is visible and easy to read not just coding and signs for the use of the retailers and manufacturers. Often, like in the case of medicine, in addition to the core message in the label, detailed information should be provided by means of information sheets.



The Importance of Reading Food Labels



The importance of reading food labels; from the author of Read It with a Grain of Salt - The Truth about Canadian Food Labels from an Industry Insider.

Uploaded by Allison Jorgens on Youtube.



Tuesday, June 24, 2014

Misleading Food Labels




We take a look at what's really in your shopping basket with many food labels causing confusion.

Produced by Michael Pell, brought to you by Australia's No. 1 Breakfast Show, Sunrise (Channel 7).






Monday, June 23, 2014

Food and Drink Giants Pledge More Action on Ads and Labeling


Food and drink companies across the world have pledged to be more transparent on their progress in phasing out advertising of high fat, salt or sugar foods to children and providing more consistent product labelling.

At a gathering in Paris, the board of the Consumer Goods Forum, a network of 400 retailers and manufacturers from 70 countries, promised to accelerate its moves to greater transparency and  more responsible marketing and said it would produce a report in January on progress made against a series of global health measures.

They include a pledge to stop advertising to children for products that do not fulfil specific nutrition criteria based on scientific evidence and/or applicable national and international dietary guidelines, by 2018.

The Forum said it would also quiz its entire membership on progress against another resolution calling for “industry-wide implementation” of consistent product labelling and consumer information to help consumers make informed choices and usages.

“The consumer goods industry acknowledges its role in the health and wellness of society, the issues around it, and the imperative need for actions. We have to scale up our efforts. We have to accelerate existing initiatives,” said Paul Bulcke, chief executive officer of NestlĂ© SA and co-sponsor of The Forum’s Health & Wellness Pillar.

Source : The Grocer UK

Sunday, June 22, 2014

FDA to tighten rules on GM tolerance thresholds

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) yesterday released three draft regulations governing the labeling of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), which would lower the threshold of tolerance for authorized GMOs in non-GM foods from 5 percent to 3 percent.
“Under the draft regulations, packaged foods containing GMOs or non-GM foods and ingredients that ‘unintentionally contain’ more than 3 percent GM materials are required to label the products as ‘genetically modified’ or ‘containing GMOs,’” said Lee Wan-chen, a section head at the agency’s Division of Food Safety.
Food ingredients that are sold loose or in small quantities are also to be subject to the same regulations, such as soybeans, soybean milk, tofu and vegetarian meat made from soy, Lee said.
Those who fail to comply would face a fine ranging from NT$30,000 to NT$3 million (US$1,000 to NT$100,000), as stipulated in Article 47 of the Act Governing Food Safety and Sanitation, Lee added.
Public comments on the draft regulations are set to close on July 19 and the regulations are scheduled to take effect on Jan. 1, 2016, except for the one governing the labeling of unpackaged GM materials, which is to be implemented in three phases, Lee said.
As of this month, the FDA has approved 67 GM food ingredients, all of which are imported, mainly from the US.
Lee said the regulations are designed to assuage some consumers’ concerns about genetically modified foods by improving transparency in GMO labeling.
“We are hoping to help consumers make informed food choices,” Lee added.
With regard to the agency’s controversial decision to lower the threshold to 3 percent rather than 0.9 percent as Minister of Health and Welfare Chiu Wen-ta had promised, Lee said the decision was made after factoring in the nation’s food supply and demand.
“Nevertheless, a further lowering of the tolerance threshold is still possible, depending on the effects of the regulations,” she said.
Currently, the unintentional presence threshold for GMOs in non-GM foods is 0.9 percent in the EU, 1 percent in New Zealand and Australia, 3 percent in Malaysia and South Korea, and 5 percent in Japan.
Source: Authored by Stacy Hsu in Taipei Times

Are You Smarter Than A Food Label?




Spoof of the popular game show, this segment pits FDA's "Labelman" against a contestant in food label knowledge. Questions cover topics such as Calories, Serving Size, Servings per Container, The 5-20 Rule and more.


Produced by CDRH-TV for CFSAN [vpfood]; uploaded by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (USFDA).





Friday, June 20, 2014

'Misleading' Label May Bring Coca-Cola in Court

Coca-Cola could face a trial over allegations of false advertising, after the US Supreme Court said the company sought to “mislead and trick consumers” by labelling as pomegranate-blueberry juice a product that contains just 0.5 per cent pomegranates and blueberries combined.


Supreme Court justices voted unanimously to allow pomegranate growers POM Wonderful to proceed with a lawsuit against Coca-Cola Co, which claims that the latter firm sought unfairly to harm its competitors with its deceptive juice labelling.

The case revolves around two rival products, both of which purport to be an healthy blend of pomegranates and blueberries. POM Wonderful’s pomegranate-blueberry juice is made up of 85 per cent pomegranate and 15 per cent blueberry juice. It is around five times more expensive than the juice produced by Coca-Cola’s Minute Maid brand, which is also labelled pomegranate-blueberry, followed in smaller print by the words: “flavoured blend of five juices”.

In fact, the Minute Maid juice consists almost entirely of apple and grape juices. POM sued Coca-Cola for damages and is seeking a ban on such labelling, which it says misleads customers about the contents of the juice. In the Supreme Court’s decision on Thursday, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote that Coca-Cola’s product is made up of “99.4 per cent apple and grape juices, 0.3 per cent pomegranate juice, 0.2 per cent blueberry juice and 0.1 per cent raspberry juice.”

Minute Maid Pomegranate Blueberry;
the product that has been mislabeled
Justice Kennedy added that the illustration on the Coca-Cola product also suggested a high pomegranate-blueberry content, despite what he described as the “miniscule” amounts of each fruit in the juice. The Minute Maid bottle, he wrote, “displays a vignette of blueberries, grapes and raspberries in front of a halved pomegranate and a halved apple.”

When the case was argued orally in April, Coca-Cola lawyer Kathleen Sullivan told the Court, “We don’t think that consumers are quite as unintelligent as POM must think they are… They know when something is a flavoured blend of five juices and the non-predominant juices are just a flavour.” But Justice Kennedy was unimpressed by her reasoning, responding: “Don’t make me feel bad because I thought this was pomegranate juice.”

The Minute Maid label technically complies with the requirements of the US Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act, which allows products to be named after their minority contents. But the Court decided it ran contrary to another law, the Lanham Act, under which companies can sue to protect their interests from unfair competition. The first law is designed to protect consumers, Justice Kennedy wrote, while the second is to protect businesses.

Authored by Tim Walker at The Independent

Decoding Product Labels



UNL Extension Turfgrass Specialist Roch Gaussoin talks about what to look for on product labels at the garden center.

Source

Thursday, June 19, 2014

What Else is Fake in Our Food?


Extra virgin olive oil, haddock, organic eggs, vodka, saffron, tea and coffee. This is not a shopping list of products for a gourmet with expensive tastes, but a list of food that is most commonly doctored or fraudulently labelled, according to a recent European Parliamentary report into food safety.

And now further evidence has come to light about Manuka Honey being frequently mislabelled, with consumers paying well over the odds for common-or-garden honey when they think they are getting the rare stuff from New Zealand. Only one of the seven samples tested by a laboratory was found to have the requisite levels of the active ingredient. This study comes just a year after it was found that there was more honey labelled as Manuka on UK shelves than was produced in a single year.

Manuka honey, according to its fans, is a wonder ingredient with antiviral and antibacterial qualities. Not as sweet as normal honey, it is made by bees gathering nectar from the delicate flowers of the Manuka Bush, native to New Zealand. A small jar, 250g, can cost as much as £34 in Ocado, and even a jar of basic Rowse Manuka honey in Tesco costs £9.99, compared with £1.78 for normal honey.

The very high price of Manuka, combined with the fact that it looks and tastes more or less like the normal thing makes it ripe for food fraudsters, keen to make a quick buck. Stuart Shotton, a former trading standards officer whose company Foodchain Europe advises retailers and manufacturers on food security, says: "Food fraud isn't anything new but you could argue that as more and more businesses are under quite a degree of stress, and are being squeezed to cut costs, the more chance of food fraud will happen."

Food fraud takes two basic forms. The first is dishonest labelling – either by claiming the product contains a larger quantity or higher quality ingredients than they actually do. This very rarely has any safety implications and was most exposed, most notoriously, last year during the horse meat scandal. This form of food fraud goes all the way back to the dawn of commerce. The Assizes of Bread and Ale, drawn up in 1266, was a piece of legislation that not only set the price of these two key staples, but was also specifically designed to outlaw the widespread rip-off that early consumers faced when buying a loaf of bread or a pot of beer. This is the origin of why, until just a few years ago, bread was always sold in pounds (or its metric equivalent) and beer in pints.

This form of food fraud is poorly policed and relies on consumers complaining to local Trading Standards Officers, but cases do come to light. The University of Salford last year found that 7 per cent of the time consumers ordered either cod or haddock in a fish and chip shop, restaurant or bought these white fish in a supermarket, they in fact ended up with Vietnamese pangasius, or catfish.

Much of the world's supply of frozen fish is produced in China which means that most of Europe's produce is flown into a Frankfurt airport rather than arriving by boat. The firm that tests the fish there, Eurofins laboratory in Hamburg is finding some species that have never been in food chain before.

In 2010 an egg wholesaler, who supplied Tesco and Sainsbury's, was jailed for three years after he was found to have passed off 100 million battery produced eggs as either free-range or organic, pocketing £3 million profit in the process.
The second main area of food fraud is when products are doctored, usually so that expensive ingredients are replaced with cheaper alternatives. Adulteration was found to be prevalent in the Roman era, with wine laced with lead and olive oil often found to be doctored. Many Victorian brands of packaged goods started as an attempt to assure customers that their food was safe, when compared with products sold loose from behind grocers' counters.

Adulteration, of course, is when food fraud becomes potentially far more dangerous, especially if the substitution is something not fit for human consumption. This is what happened in China, in 2008, when baby milk was doctored with melamine. This had the effect of boosting the protein content of the milk. It is estimated that at least six children died from this scandal.

Mr Shotton says: "This is organised crime at the highest level. Someone was clever enough to work that the way they tested the milk was checking the protein content. They then worked out that protein is measured by looking at the amount of nitrogen produced, and then they said, 'Oh, OK, melamine is a good source of nitrogen.' A lot of thought has gone into it."

According to the European Parliament, olive oil is the product most likely to be adulterated. Four out of five bottles of 'Italian' olive oil were found to be adulterated with lower quality oil from other Mediterranean countries, a police investigation discovered back in 2011. And fake olive oil is often linked to Mafia activities.

Within the next few weeks, Prof Chris Elliot, Chair of Food Safety and Microbiology at Queen's University Belfast, will publish his final report for the government into food fraud and food supply chains. His interim report, which was commissioned in the wake of the horse meat scandal, said: "Limited intelligence has been collected and it is not possible to gauge whether we are dealing mainly with systematic criminality perpetrated by individuals and groups operating exclusively in the food chain, or whether organised criminal networks (i.e. those already established in activities such as trafficking drugs, cigarettes, fuel, firearms or humans) have moved into food crime."

In 2011, five Lithuanians were killed when an explosion blew up an illegal vodka factory in Boston, Lincolnshire, suggesting that food crime in the UK is possibly more widespread than is thought. Lincolnshire Police investigated the explosion but no criminal charges were ever brought.

Written by Harry Wallop at The Telegraph

Wednesday, June 18, 2014

Healthy Buzzwords on Junk Food Labels Trick Consumers


Buzzwords like “gluten-free,” “antioxidants” and “whole-grain” pepper the grocery store aisles, but do they really mean that such products are healthy? A recent study conducted at the University of Houston warns shoppers to proceed with caution.

Researchers say these health-related euphemisms have a powerful impact on consumers and, in light of the actual ingredients in some of these products, could convey a false sense of health.

For example, Cherry 7Up now bears the “antioxidant” label, which has become the emblem of anti-aging and prevention of cancer and heart disease.

“Saying Cherry 7-Up contains antioxidants is misleading,” says Temple Northup, an assistant professor at the Jack J. Valenti School of Communication at UH. “Food marketers are exploiting consumer desires to be healthy by marketing products as nutritious when, in fact, they’re not.”

Although the FDA requires Nutrition Information labels in the United States and similar labeling systems are seen in other countries, Northup’s research concludes they have little effect on consumers.

“Words like organic, antioxidant, natural and gluten-free imply some sort of healthy benefit,” Northup said. “When people stop to think about it, there’s nothing healthy about Antioxidant Cherry 7-Up — it’s mostly filled with high fructose syrup or sugar. But its name is giving you this clue that there is some sort of health benefit to something that is not healthy at all.”

In the study, a total of 318 participants were asked to analyze the health aspects of certain products and determine if they were actually healthy for them.

Participants were shown labels of the following products both with and without their accompanying “magic words”: Annie’s Bunny Fruit Snacks (organic), Apple Sauce (organic), Chef Boyardee Beefaroni (whole grain) Chef Boyardee Lasagna (whole grain), Chocolate Cheerios (heart healthy), Cherry 7Up (antioxidant), Smuckers Peanut Butter (all natural) and Tostitos (all natural).

Using an online survey, Northup’s team showed participants the labels of the products mentioned as well as versions that had the buzzwords removed using Photoshop. They were asked to rate how healthy they thought each product was.

According to results, when advertising promises health benefits, consumers respond.

“Each time a participant saw one of the triggering words on a label, they would identify it as healthier than the other image without the word,” said Northup.

Northup’s research delved into the psychological aspect of manipulation via word connotations, called “priming,” and how it can influence beliefs and inspire behaviors.

Indeed, in one phase of the study, participants leaned towards the processed, canned meat product Spam as the healthier option over salmon.

Northup says this is an example of how advertising can mislead consumers and that it also indicates a common lack of understanding of the information provided by nutrition labels.

He hopes his research will lead to greater media literacy and an enlightened public understanding of food marketing.

The study, titled “Truth, Lies, and Packaging: How Food Marketing Creates a False Sense of Health,” was published in Food Studies.


- AFP Relaxnews 



What Is Products Labeling?

Everyday in your life, you will deal with a lot of products. You wake up in King Koil bed, brush your teeth with Oral-B toothbrush and Colgate toothpaste and then drive to work in Proton Prevé. In order to be recognized, most of products will have their own label.

Have you ever wonder, what is actually product labeling? According to Wikipedia, package labeling is any written, electronic, or graphic communication on the package or on a separate but associated label. In simple words, product labeling is any information given to consumers on the product; about the product.

Products without label is like people without names;others would not recognize you.

Consumers need information on products in order to choose and buy them such as the name, price, contents of the product, directions for use, storage and warnings of dangers, if any.

What's so important about this product labeling? We will discuss about this on the next post. Stay updated!

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More