_

Welcome to Vital Label!

Vital Label is a blog focused on the importance of labeling in consumer products.

Malaysia National Consumers Day 2014 (HPM 2014)

The National Consumers Day is an annual event organized by FOMCA. Let's celebrate it by participating in 12 competitions held at the national level.

Follow Us On Facebook

Like our Facebook page to get our updates on your news feed.

Showing posts with label misleading. Show all posts
Showing posts with label misleading. Show all posts

Thursday, July 3, 2014

7 Misleading Labels on Food Products


Have you ever decided to choose one grocery item over another because of the health benefit claims on the label? You may have been tricked. That’s because terms like 100% natural or no cholestrol are often labeled on a food item that may not be healthy at all. 

Frustrated? You wouldn't anymore. Here's the list of the 7 common—and most misleading phrases—manufacturers use on food, with advice on how to look past the hype to make smarter supermarket choices.

1. All natural
It seems reasonable to assume that a product labeled “all natural” comes almost directly from the farm to the shelf. But the FDA has relatively few guidelines governing the use of the term and admits that some “natural” food “has probably been processed and is no longer the product of the earth.”

The only requirement the FDA has for using the phrase “natural” is that the product contains no added color, artificial flavors or synthetic substances. These not-so-natural products can often contain unhealthy additives like preservatives, high fructose corn syrup and GMOs; meats, milk, cheese and other products may come from animals treated with growth hormones or antibiotics.

Better word to look for:
organic (but see notes on this term later in the article)

2. Wheat or multigrain

Seeing that a product is “made with whole grains,” or is labeled “wheat” or “multigrain” should be a plus for consumers. Unfortunately, those words have little merit by themselves. Such products can have as little as 1 percent of whole grains, and while the number can range up to 49 percent, it’s difficult to know how much the food actually contains.

Better word to look for:
100% whole grain, 100% whole wheat, a whole grain listed as the first ingredient

3. Sugar free & No Sugar Added

In general, steer clear of products that are labeled “sugar free.” Such foods often contain artificial sweeteners or “sugar alcohols.” While artificial sweeteners usually have zero calories, there are a number of studies questioning their safety, particularly with causing cancer and other health concerns. Sugar alcohols have substantially less calories than sugar; however, they still contain calories and carbohydrates (and the foods they’re in sometimes have high amounts of each), and consuming large amounts can cause diarrhea.

Better word to look for:
100% fruit juice sweetened (verify in ingredients list)

4. Fat free

It’s true that it’s good to avoid trans and saturated fats, but that doesn’t mean fat-free foods are healthy. Actually, foods labeled with this phrase can include just as much sugar and calories as foods with higher fat content. (See “Superfood of the Day: Avocado” to learn how calories and healthy fats from the delicious avocado fruit are good for you.)

Better word to look for:
Naturally low-calorie (usually associated with whole or minimally-processed foods)

5. Cholesterol free

Foods labeled “cholesterol free” may still contain 2 milligrams (mg) per serving while “low cholesterol” products can contain up to 20 mg. The term “reduced cholesterol” refers to products that contain 25 percent less cholesterol than comparable products. Regardless of the amount of cholesterol in the food, products with this label can still contain trans and saturated fats, which are known to raise LDL, or “bad,” cholesterol levels.

Better word to look for:
When a product claims to be “cholesterol-free,” “low cholesterol,” or “reduced cholesterol,” check the label to make sure it isn’t loaded with saturated and trans fats.

6. Made with Real Fruit

While certain packaged foods may say they’re “made with real fruit,” it’s difficult to know how much—or how little—actual real fruit it contains. Additionally, these products can (and often do) contain a slew of other ingredients, such as sugar and artificial colors and flavors, that offset the nutritional value the real fruit ingredients may have added.

Better word to look for:
100 percent real fruit (such as in dried fruit snacks; watch for added sugar)

7. Organic

When you’re shopping for apples, carrots or other whole foods, organic is a good option. Compared with other terms, the FDA provides relatively strict guidelines for foods that use this term and accompanying USDA organic label. But, when buying prepared or processed foods, the term “organic” has become synonymous with “healthy.” Just because you buy organic cookies, however, it doesn’t mean they’re healthy. Be sure to check the labels of all non-whole foods you purchase so that you’re aware of the amount of calories, fats, cholesterol, sugar and other ingredients in your food.

Better word to look for:
Organic is still a great option, but be sure you’re aware of what’s in your food.

The key? Don’t trust buzzwords big companies use as marketing tactics. Read labels and be aware of what you put into your body.

What are some other misleading words you’ve seen on packaging labels? Please share in the comments.


Friday, June 20, 2014

'Misleading' Label May Bring Coca-Cola in Court

Coca-Cola could face a trial over allegations of false advertising, after the US Supreme Court said the company sought to “mislead and trick consumers” by labelling as pomegranate-blueberry juice a product that contains just 0.5 per cent pomegranates and blueberries combined.


Supreme Court justices voted unanimously to allow pomegranate growers POM Wonderful to proceed with a lawsuit against Coca-Cola Co, which claims that the latter firm sought unfairly to harm its competitors with its deceptive juice labelling.

The case revolves around two rival products, both of which purport to be an healthy blend of pomegranates and blueberries. POM Wonderful’s pomegranate-blueberry juice is made up of 85 per cent pomegranate and 15 per cent blueberry juice. It is around five times more expensive than the juice produced by Coca-Cola’s Minute Maid brand, which is also labelled pomegranate-blueberry, followed in smaller print by the words: “flavoured blend of five juices”.

In fact, the Minute Maid juice consists almost entirely of apple and grape juices. POM sued Coca-Cola for damages and is seeking a ban on such labelling, which it says misleads customers about the contents of the juice. In the Supreme Court’s decision on Thursday, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote that Coca-Cola’s product is made up of “99.4 per cent apple and grape juices, 0.3 per cent pomegranate juice, 0.2 per cent blueberry juice and 0.1 per cent raspberry juice.”

Minute Maid Pomegranate Blueberry;
the product that has been mislabeled
Justice Kennedy added that the illustration on the Coca-Cola product also suggested a high pomegranate-blueberry content, despite what he described as the “miniscule” amounts of each fruit in the juice. The Minute Maid bottle, he wrote, “displays a vignette of blueberries, grapes and raspberries in front of a halved pomegranate and a halved apple.”

When the case was argued orally in April, Coca-Cola lawyer Kathleen Sullivan told the Court, “We don’t think that consumers are quite as unintelligent as POM must think they are… They know when something is a flavoured blend of five juices and the non-predominant juices are just a flavour.” But Justice Kennedy was unimpressed by her reasoning, responding: “Don’t make me feel bad because I thought this was pomegranate juice.”

The Minute Maid label technically complies with the requirements of the US Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act, which allows products to be named after their minority contents. But the Court decided it ran contrary to another law, the Lanham Act, under which companies can sue to protect their interests from unfair competition. The first law is designed to protect consumers, Justice Kennedy wrote, while the second is to protect businesses.

Authored by Tim Walker at The Independent

Thursday, June 19, 2014

What Else is Fake in Our Food?


Extra virgin olive oil, haddock, organic eggs, vodka, saffron, tea and coffee. This is not a shopping list of products for a gourmet with expensive tastes, but a list of food that is most commonly doctored or fraudulently labelled, according to a recent European Parliamentary report into food safety.

And now further evidence has come to light about Manuka Honey being frequently mislabelled, with consumers paying well over the odds for common-or-garden honey when they think they are getting the rare stuff from New Zealand. Only one of the seven samples tested by a laboratory was found to have the requisite levels of the active ingredient. This study comes just a year after it was found that there was more honey labelled as Manuka on UK shelves than was produced in a single year.

Manuka honey, according to its fans, is a wonder ingredient with antiviral and antibacterial qualities. Not as sweet as normal honey, it is made by bees gathering nectar from the delicate flowers of the Manuka Bush, native to New Zealand. A small jar, 250g, can cost as much as £34 in Ocado, and even a jar of basic Rowse Manuka honey in Tesco costs £9.99, compared with £1.78 for normal honey.

The very high price of Manuka, combined with the fact that it looks and tastes more or less like the normal thing makes it ripe for food fraudsters, keen to make a quick buck. Stuart Shotton, a former trading standards officer whose company Foodchain Europe advises retailers and manufacturers on food security, says: "Food fraud isn't anything new but you could argue that as more and more businesses are under quite a degree of stress, and are being squeezed to cut costs, the more chance of food fraud will happen."

Food fraud takes two basic forms. The first is dishonest labelling – either by claiming the product contains a larger quantity or higher quality ingredients than they actually do. This very rarely has any safety implications and was most exposed, most notoriously, last year during the horse meat scandal. This form of food fraud goes all the way back to the dawn of commerce. The Assizes of Bread and Ale, drawn up in 1266, was a piece of legislation that not only set the price of these two key staples, but was also specifically designed to outlaw the widespread rip-off that early consumers faced when buying a loaf of bread or a pot of beer. This is the origin of why, until just a few years ago, bread was always sold in pounds (or its metric equivalent) and beer in pints.

This form of food fraud is poorly policed and relies on consumers complaining to local Trading Standards Officers, but cases do come to light. The University of Salford last year found that 7 per cent of the time consumers ordered either cod or haddock in a fish and chip shop, restaurant or bought these white fish in a supermarket, they in fact ended up with Vietnamese pangasius, or catfish.

Much of the world's supply of frozen fish is produced in China which means that most of Europe's produce is flown into a Frankfurt airport rather than arriving by boat. The firm that tests the fish there, Eurofins laboratory in Hamburg is finding some species that have never been in food chain before.

In 2010 an egg wholesaler, who supplied Tesco and Sainsbury's, was jailed for three years after he was found to have passed off 100 million battery produced eggs as either free-range or organic, pocketing £3 million profit in the process.
The second main area of food fraud is when products are doctored, usually so that expensive ingredients are replaced with cheaper alternatives. Adulteration was found to be prevalent in the Roman era, with wine laced with lead and olive oil often found to be doctored. Many Victorian brands of packaged goods started as an attempt to assure customers that their food was safe, when compared with products sold loose from behind grocers' counters.

Adulteration, of course, is when food fraud becomes potentially far more dangerous, especially if the substitution is something not fit for human consumption. This is what happened in China, in 2008, when baby milk was doctored with melamine. This had the effect of boosting the protein content of the milk. It is estimated that at least six children died from this scandal.

Mr Shotton says: "This is organised crime at the highest level. Someone was clever enough to work that the way they tested the milk was checking the protein content. They then worked out that protein is measured by looking at the amount of nitrogen produced, and then they said, 'Oh, OK, melamine is a good source of nitrogen.' A lot of thought has gone into it."

According to the European Parliament, olive oil is the product most likely to be adulterated. Four out of five bottles of 'Italian' olive oil were found to be adulterated with lower quality oil from other Mediterranean countries, a police investigation discovered back in 2011. And fake olive oil is often linked to Mafia activities.

Within the next few weeks, Prof Chris Elliot, Chair of Food Safety and Microbiology at Queen's University Belfast, will publish his final report for the government into food fraud and food supply chains. His interim report, which was commissioned in the wake of the horse meat scandal, said: "Limited intelligence has been collected and it is not possible to gauge whether we are dealing mainly with systematic criminality perpetrated by individuals and groups operating exclusively in the food chain, or whether organised criminal networks (i.e. those already established in activities such as trafficking drugs, cigarettes, fuel, firearms or humans) have moved into food crime."

In 2011, five Lithuanians were killed when an explosion blew up an illegal vodka factory in Boston, Lincolnshire, suggesting that food crime in the UK is possibly more widespread than is thought. Lincolnshire Police investigated the explosion but no criminal charges were ever brought.

Written by Harry Wallop at The Telegraph

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More